home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: news.onramp.net!usenet
- From: dcorn@paradise.pplnet.com (David Corn)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy,comp.sys.amiga.introduction,comp.sys.amiga.misc,comp.sys.amiga.programmer
- Subject: Re: What I want from new Workbench
- Date: Mon, 01 Apr 1996 00:53:02 GMT
- Organization: On-Ramp; Individual Internet Connections; Dallas/Ft Worth/Houston, TX USA
- Message-ID: <315b1229.21304675@news.onramp.net>
- References: <4ht6pc$bqk@nadine.teleport.com> <1455.6645T1307T2033@actcom.co.il> <314ce43f.2844388@news.onramp.net> <4imdng$cit@beavis.kronos.com> <3151f5c0.20186634@news.onramp.net> <4j2r07$bvo@the-fly.zip.com.au>
- Reply-To: dcorn@paradise.pplnet.com
- NNTP-Posting-Host: modem1.pplnet.com
- X-Newsreader: Forte Agent .99d/32.182
-
- On 24 Mar 1996 06:44:23 GMT, stuartm@zip.com.au (Stuart Mackinnon)
- wrote:
-
- >has to actually read an icon from is a ".exe" or ".com". Workbench on the other
- >hand has to load every icon that it shows. Also the icon is loaded into CHIP ram,
- >etc.
-
- Yet -another- problem, especially for 512k and 1M chip owners.
-
- >Your probably also using a faster PC, but that aside, Workbench is doing much
- >more per icon, and that is probably the most inefficient part of Workbench -
- >especially if you are viewing by name.
-
- As I was.
-